Judicial Comments
Plain-English digest of CPS prosecution guidance.
AI-generated summary — not verbatim. This is a plain-English digest, not the official CPS text. It may omit detail or fall out of date. Do not rely on it for a charging decision — read the full guidance on cps.gov.uk and check the current legislation.
This guidance outlines the procedures and considerations for Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) representatives in responding to comments made by judges and magistrates during legal proceedings. It addresses public criticism, the handling of commendations or criticisms of the police, and appropriate actions for comments regarding other organizations. It emphasizes the importance of maintaining professionalism and adherence to proper protocols when judges express views on CPS policy or case management.
Key points
- Judicial comments can be made in public or private.
- CPS should respond to criticisms promptly and appropriately.
- Commendations of police must be communicated to Chief Constables.
- Allegations of perjury must be investigated carefully.
- CPS must maintain records of judicial comments and actions taken.
- Unit Heads should report serious complaints to relevant authorities.
Public-interest factors
- Maintaining public confidence in prosecution processes.
- Protecting the integrity of judicial proceedings.
- Ensuring transparency in judicial comments.
- Promoting accountability among law enforcement agencies.
- Safeguarding the reputation of the CPS.
- Facilitating fair treatment of witnesses.
This is a factual digest of guidance published by the Crown Prosecution Service. Digested 2026-07-15. BlueLineHub is independent and not affiliated with the CPS.