Quick reference guide - supervisors
Stop and Search — Authorised Professional Practice
Summary
This guide outlines the responsibilities of supervisors in overseeing stop and search practices within policing. Supervisors should create a supportive environment that encourages open discussion regarding stop and search, ensuring that officers feel confident in conducting their duties lawfully and professionally. They are to monitor compliance with relevant legislation, scrutinize stop and search records, and analyse data to identify trends and areas for improvement. Supervisors also have a duty to respond appropriately to any concerns regarding an officer's conduct, ensuring adherence to professional standards, and to keep accurate records of monitoring and supervision efforts. Training and development of officers in stop and search practices are crucial, with supervisors facilitating and encouraging promising practices and addressing any gaps in knowledge or performance.
Key principles
- 1Establish a supportive environment for open challenge.
- 2Monitor compliance with legal and professional standards.
- 3Scrutinise and analyse stop and search records and data.
- 4Encourage continuous officer training and development.
- 5Respond appropriately to concerns about officer conduct.
- 6Record and document supervision activities.
Defined terms
- Code A
- The Code of Practice that outlines the conditions under which stop and search may be exercised.
- BUSSS
- The requirement to record whether anything was found during a stop and search.
- EIP
- Searches that expose intimate parts of the body.
Full guidance
Definition of a fair and effective stop and search encounter, how and why stop and search encounters should be fair, legal, professional and transparent
This page is from APP, the official source of professional practice for policing.
The primary purpose of stop and search powers is to enable officers to allay or confirm suspicions about individuals without exercising their power of arrest (Code A paragraph 1.4(opens an external website in the same tab) ). A stop and search where no illegal item is found may still be a legitimate outcome if it is conducted in a fair, lawful, professional and transparent way.
focus on the lawfulness of search activity (in basis and in application), its effectiveness, and its compliance with professional and procedural requirements * recognise and support good stop and search practices by officers, even where nothing is found * be guided by the Code of Ethics and the National Decision Model in their decision making
Establish a supportive environment
Supervisors should seek to establish a supportive environment in which open and effective challenge can take place.
Officers should be confident they will be supported in their use of stop and search, provided their decisions and conduct are lawful, fair, professional and transparent. * Supervisors should acknowledge that searches can be legitimate even where nothing is found, recognise and share promising and compliant practices, highlight positive encounters and support officer development where it is needed. * Supervisors should not use volumetric performance targets to assess stop and search, and should not use the number of searches as a measure of officer productivity. If quantitative frameworks are used, they should be accompanied by measures to mitigate the risk of unintended outcomes.
Facilitate and support training
Supervising officers are responsible for ensuring that their officers complete stop and search training as required by force policy.
They should allocate training time and monitor completion levels. * They should ensure that officers’ learning is kept up to date as appropriate, and that additional learning is undertaken where there is a development need. * Supervisors should also consider what additional action may be required at a local level to support the training, in order to maximise its impact.
Encourage promising practice and highlight development needs
Supervisors should aim to use monitoring and more proactive supervision to:
identify and encourage promising practices * highlight development needs * identify where additional or closer supervisory support may be required
Supervisors must monitor stop and search to ensure its use is appropriate, is lawful and complies fully with Code A. This should enable them to account for its use. The supervision of stop and search should not be viewed as a ‘tick box exercise’. The nature, extent and frequency of this monitoring should be proportionate to local or force concerns.
Scrutinise stop and search records of all those supervised
Supervisors should scrutinise stop and search records to ensure:
compliance with the recording requirements (is the record complete and are the grounds made out?) * compliance, where applicable, with the BUSSS requirement to record whether or not anything was found, if it was linked to the reason for the stop and search, and the outcome of the stop and search * accurate transfer of the record onto the relevant force data system * that the written grounds are sufficiently detailed and reasonable (forces may require supervisors to check every stop and search form) * compliance with Code A and other procedural requirements (for example, sex of search officer, appropriate referrals and safeguarding notifications being made for children and young people) * consideration is given to whether there is any evidence that powers may have been used on the basis of stereotyped images or inappropriate generalisations
Analyse team and officer-level data
Supervisors should examine team- and officer-level data to understand trends and patterns in stop and search use, for example:
the number of repeat (unsuccessful) searches of the same person * the proportion of searches resulting in an arrest or other criminal justice outcome * the proportion of searches based on information and intelligence, focused on force or local priorities, targeted towards active prolific offenders and/or carried out in recognised crime hot spots
Be proactive
Options for more proactive supervision that supervisors should consider include:
reviewing body-worn video (BWV) footage of stop and search encounters (where available) * directly observing stop and search encounters while on patrol * listening into stop and search encounters over the radio * debriefing stop and search encounters in person with individual officers while reviewing the stop and search record * exploring complaints, or any other evidence of dissatisfaction, related to stop and search * keeping their own records of search exposing intimate parts of the body (EIP) consultations – who, when and what the outcome of the consultation was (reasons and whether EIP search went ahead) – so that these can be cross-referenced to officer records
Supervisors must take timely and appropriate action if any concerns come to light about a team’s or an officer’s use of stop and search – for example, if an officer does not respond positively to additional support or breaches professional standards of behaviour.
The appropriateness of the response will depend on the circumstances of each case. * It may also be appropriate for supervisors to escalate concerns to a more senior officer, to take formal management action or to liaise with professional standards for them to consider disciplinary action. * Supervisors should refer to the Code of Ethics, employment law and human resources policies and guidance when developing their response.
Supervisors should also record:
their monitoring activities * any proactive supervision and associated follow-up in relation to team and officer use of stop and search * any relevant outcomes of these activities
Do not provide personal information such as your name or email address in the feedback form. Read our privacy policy for more information on how we use this data
What is the reason for your answer?
APP is the authoritative source for UK policing practice and is updated over time. For the current, official version — including any operational detail not reproduced here — go direct.
Read the full APP guidanceSource: College of Policing — Authorised Professional Practice · Crown copyright, licensed under Open Government Licence v3.0. Summary fetched 2026-06-27.