Skip to content

Intelligence report example (Appendix A)

Intelligence management — Authorised Professional Practice

All topics

Summary

This page provides an example of an intelligence report, including a structured template for officers to follow. It outlines various elements that should be included in an intelligence report, such as the report title, date and time, source evaluation, and handling codes. Additionally, it describes the different categories for evaluating the reliability of the source and the knowledge level of the information provided. Officers are guided on the importance of accurate and complete reporting, which supports effective intelligence management within policing operations.

Key principles

  • 1Follow the structured template for reporting.
  • 2Evaluate source reliability and information assessment accurately.
  • 3Use defined handling codes for information sharing.

Defined terms

Source evaluation
1 - Reliable, 2 - Untested, 3 - Not reliable
Information assessment
A - Known directly to source, B - Known indirectly to source but corroborated, C - Known indirectly to source, D - Not known, E - Suspected to be false
Handling code
P - Lawful sharing permitted, C - Lawful sharing permitted with conditions
Action condition
A1 - Covert development, A2 - Covert use, A3 - Overt use
Sanitisation condition
S1 - Delegated authority, S2 - Consult originator

Full guidance

Intelligence report example (Appendix A)

Intelligence cycle, tasking and coordination and completing an intelligence report

This page is from APP, the official source of professional practice for policing.

| | | | --- | --- | | Government security <br>classification | Official<br><br>Secret<br><br>Top secret | | Organisation and <br>officer | | | Date and time of report | | | Source or intelligence source reference (ISR) | | | Report URN | | | Source evaluation | 1 - Reliable<br><br>2 - Untested<br><br>3 - Not reliable | | Information or intelligence assessment | A - Known directly to source<br><br>B - Known indirectly to source but corroborated<br><br>C - Known indirectly to source<br><br>D - Not known<br><br>E - Suspected to be false | | Report title | | | Person record | Name<br><br>Date of birth<br><br>PNC ID | | Operation name and number | | | Information content | | | Handling code | P - Lawful sharing permitted<br><br>C - Lawful sharing permitted with conditions | | Action condition (only relevant if handling <br>code C selected) | A1 - Covert development<br><br>A2 - Covert use<br><br>A3 - Overt use | | Sanitisation condition (only relevant if handling <br>code C selected) | S1 - Delegated authority<br><br>S2 - Consult originator |

Do not provide personal information such as your name or email address in the feedback form. Read our privacy policy for more information on how we use this data

What is the reason for your answer?

Reproduced from the College of Policing Authorised Professional Practice under the Open Government Licence v3.0, as captured on 2026-06-27. APP is amended over time — check the source link below for the current version. This is a reference, not operational authorisation.

APP is the authoritative source for UK policing practice and is updated over time. For the current, official version — including any operational detail not reproduced here — go direct.

Read the full APP guidance

Source: College of Policing — Authorised Professional Practice · Crown copyright, licensed under Open Government Licence v3.0. Summary fetched 2026-06-27.