Skip to content

Data ethics principles

Data ethics — Authorised Professional Practice

All topics

Summary

This APP page outlines key principles for making ethical decisions when collecting, storing, sharing, or using data in policing. Officers and staff should prioritize public welfare, respect individual dignity, ensure fairness, and maintain transparency in data handling. The importance of using robust evidence and regularly evaluating processes is emphasized, alongside the necessity of human oversight in decisions made with data-driven technologies. These principles aim to uphold ethical standards, protect individual rights, and further public good in policing practices.

Key principles

  • 1Processes should prioritize the safety and wellbeing of the public.
  • 2Processes must show the highest standards of respect towards individuals and groups.
  • 3Processes must operate with fairness and impartiality.
  • 4Processing of personal data should be proportionate to policing tasks.
  • 5Processes should be based on robust evidence.
  • 6Processes should be evaluated based on associated risks.
  • 7A human must make the final decision when using information generated by data-driven technologies.

Defined terms

protected characteristics
As defined in the Equality Act 2010.
Human Rights Act 1998
UK legislation that protects human rights.
Data Protection Act 2018
UK legislation covering data protection and privacy.

Full guidance

Guidance on making ethical decisions where data is being collected, stored, shared or used.

This page is from APP, the official source of professional practice for policing.

All officers and staff should consider the following principles when using data as part of their role.

The Appendix sets out additional questions that can help officers and staff to explore whether they are meeting these principles.

Processes should prioritise the safety and wellbeing of the public. When collecting and using data, the police should pay attention to any risks that may threaten an individual’s or group’s privacy or security. It is essential that the process has contributed to the advancement of public good.

Processes should show the highest standards of respect towards individuals and groups, as set out in the Code of Ethics .

Processes must operate with fairness and impartiality. They must not discriminate against, or disadvantage, individuals. This especially applies to vulnerable people, and to individuals and groups based on their ‘protected characteristics’, as defined in the Equality Act 2010(opens an external website in the same tab) .

Processes should be transparent. The processing of personal data by police officers and staff, particularly sensitive data, should be proportionate to the policing task. Processes should respect sensitive personal data and human rights in accordance with UK law, including the Human Rights Act 1998(opens an external website in the same tab) and the Data Protection Act 2018(opens an external website in the same tab) .

Where a process restricts fundamental rights, such as the right of respect for private and family life and the right to freedom of expression, senior leaders should ensure that any limitations imposed:

are lawful, necessary and proportionate * fulfil a legitimate purpose

Processes should be based on robust evidence that offers a thorough understanding of the data at hand, while raising awareness of potential biases and errors. This will include testing data that has been inputted or produced to ensure it is reliable. This ensures that ethical standards are maintained, and that decisions are made with precision and accountability.

Processes should be evaluated based on the level of associated risk to the data subjects, both prior to and after a process’s application. Further support can be found in the Data-driven technologies APP.

It is essential that a human makes the final decision when using information generated by a data-driven technology, and where there is a risk that the decision will have an impact on an individual, groups or communities. The human-in-the-loop makes the decision advised by the technology. The technology does not make the final decision.

Do not provide personal information such as your name or email address in the feedback form. Read our privacy policy for more information on how we use this data

What is the reason for your answer?

Reproduced from the College of Policing Authorised Professional Practice under the Open Government Licence v3.0, as captured on 2026-06-27. APP is amended over time — check the source link below for the current version. This is a reference, not operational authorisation.

APP is the authoritative source for UK policing practice and is updated over time. For the current, official version — including any operational detail not reproduced here — go direct.

Read the full APP guidance

Source: College of Policing — Authorised Professional Practice · Crown copyright, licensed under Open Government Licence v3.0. Summary fetched 2026-06-27.