IOPC to investigate complaints against Met decision over Operation Midland witnesses
Factual summary of a published IOPC investigation, covering the incident, key findings and outcome.
All IOPC reports Read the full report on policeconduct.gov.uk
- Published
- 2022-03-29
- Investigation type
- independent
- Force involved
- Metropolitan Police Service
What was investigated
The IOPC is investigating complaints about the MPS's decision not to investigate two complainants, referred to as Witness A and Witness B, who allegedly made false accusations during Operation Midland, which investigated non-recent sexual abuse allegations against several individuals.
Key findings
- The MPS did not investigate complaints against Witnesses A and B.
- Sir Richard Henriques recommended considering offences of perverting the course of justice against Witnesses A and B.
- Merseyside Police previously investigated similar complaints and finalized the report in June 2021.
- Significant shortcomings were identified in Operation Midland.
Outcome
The investigation is ongoing, following complaints made by individuals adversely affected.
Related on BlueLineHub
- Accountability hub — how oversight of UK policing works
- IOPC outcomes & learning feed
- Metropolitan Police Service force profile
Reviewed by the BlueLineHub Editorial Team
Last reviewed: 14 July 2026 · Next review due: 14 January 2027
This is a factual summary of a report published by the Independent Office for Police Conduct. Individuals are referred to exactly as the source report anonymises them. BlueLineHub is independent and not affiliated with the IOPC · Summarised 2026-07-14.