Investigation finds no case to answer regarding MPS applications for warrants during Operation Midland
Factual summary of a published IOPC investigation, covering the incident, key findings and outcome.
- Published
- 2019-07-22
- Investigation type
- independent
- Force involved
- Metropolitan Police Service
What was investigated
The IOPC investigated the conduct of three officers involved in applying for warrants during Operation Midland, looking into allegations of misconduct related to the accuracy of the warrant applications. The investigation concluded that there was no evidence any officer deliberately withheld information to mislead the district judge, and no case to answer for misconduct was found.
Key findings
- No evidence that any officer deliberately withheld evidence.
- Officers acted in good faith and with due diligence.
- Investigators reviewed a significant volume of material.
- Applications were based on available information at the time.
- No indication of bad faith in decision-making by officers.
- The statement provided by the officers aligned with their actions during the investigation.
- No evidence to suggest misconduct proceedings were justified.
- The passage of time impacted the investigation's clarity.
Outcome
The investigation found no case to answer for misconduct against any of the officers involved. The IOPC concluded that they acted appropriately given the circumstances and information at hand.
Related on BlueLineHub
- Accountability hub — how oversight of UK policing works
- IOPC outcomes & learning feed
- Metropolitan Police Service force profile
This is a factual summary of a report published by the Independent Office for Police Conduct. Individuals are referred to exactly as the source report anonymises them. BlueLineHub is independent and not affiliated with the IOPC · Summarised 2026-07-13.